Clinton Comments 2

See article:

To: jent

We have a threat greater than communism delivered to us by a socialist President elected by fools like myself(the first term)and given a second term by idiot democrats and moderate Republicans in the hope that he would save the world from evil conservatives and their corporate associates.
Yes I voted for him the first time as I found it impossible to vote GHB into office again, his New World Order was my first clue as to his real philosophy for Amerika.
Shout me down all you will, that is your right now,but for how long are we going to have that right.Will we as history has shown fail as a nation because we permit our elected officials to betray us for their own benefit.We need only look at the UK and the manner in which the EU constitution was being forced upon them without a referendum (The U.K. SUN covered that in depth).I said WAS as T. Blair had to retreat on signing on, FOR NOW.
It has also come to my attention that the Secret Service has requested that anti Bush protesters be held at a distance during his U.S. campaign and oversea visits (The U.K.) and people have been charged with various offenses for mearly expressing their disagreement with his policies.The local authorities have been given the task of policing and segregating these individuals and groups from the President and even the press in order to push an agenda.Federal charges have been brought against at least one individual in that respect however to my knowledge all of these charges have been dismissed due to first amendment violation on the part of authorities involved and the overriding evidence that those charged were no threat to President Bush or the Nation.....If I have erred please give me the correct information as I am not to proud to seek the truth (what actually occurred)and stand corrected.

16 posted on 01/05/2004 1:43:31 PM PST by Papabear47

To: jent

From another article, same author, which names some of the groups:

These guidelines were presented to America as drafted by "thirty-five religious groups." The truth is they were drafted by the American Muslim Council, American Humanist Association, Americans United for Seperation (sic) of Church and State, many more recognizable secularist groups among a few Christian-sounding names, along with the ACLU which also holds the copyright.

Bush Country

18 posted on 01/05/2004 1:51:11 PM PST by ravingnutter

To: Viking2002

Terrorism. Islam. Public schools. ACLU. Clinton. All woven together, just like the web of an anti-Christian, anti-West spider. All keywords synonymous with The Enemies Of America. More and more, the battle lines are being defined.

So true.

19 posted on 01/05/2004 1:55:06 PM PST by EverOnward

To: sarasota

Yawn........anyone surprised?

21 posted on 01/05/2004 2:35:33 PM PST by TaxPayer2000 (The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government,)

: jent

why do they even bother trying to terrorize us when they can just infiltrate from within. their goal is to turn us all into islamic fanatics, right?

23 posted on 01/05/2004 2:49:42 PM PST by ecru

To: ravingnutter

I have no brief pro or con on the guidelines, but if you Google "guidelines on Religious expression in public schools", you will find them posted on the web sites of the Christian Legal Association, American Center for Law and Justice and Focus on the Family, either neutrally or favorably. As I remember the coverage at the time, these particular guidelines in fact supported individual student expression, as against teachers who wanted to confiscate Bibles, etc.

I'd recommend reading the full guidelines and deciding for yourself.

http://www.aclj.org/ussc/add_info/doe_religious_expression.asp

24 posted on 01/05/2004 3:39:42 PM PST by BohDaThone

To: jent

Additionally, Clinton went beyond the ACLU copyright guidelines and added:
"Students generally do not have a Federal right to be excused from lessons that may be inconsistent with their religious beliefs or practices."

Pay attention. There went religious freedom.

What happened to their cries for separation of church and state? Can this ACLU/Clintoon guideline not be used to allow Christian teachings in school as well?

25 posted on 01/05/2004 3:43:00 PM PST by highlander_UW

To: BohDaThone

I'd recommend reading the full guidelines and deciding for yourself.

Now you're just being silly......

26 posted on 01/05/2004 4:37:17 PM PST by gdani (Have you played Atari today?)

From FreeRepublic

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.