From Contra Costa TimesA FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST the
Byron school district's teaching of Islam to seventh graders will
focus on the very significant difference between teaching and
indoctrination. Public schools must obviously balance that difference
skillfully and sensitively because the fact is any world history
course worth its weight must address religion. After all, the reality
is religion is often at the heart of controversies that have shaped
our world, for better or worse.
The question of whether creative teaching methods can be construed
as indoctrination is the core of the lawsuit brought by the Thomas
More Center for Law and Justice in Michigan. The suit charges that
when Byron students simulated various exercises about the Islamic
faith, including dressing in traditional clothes, assuming Muslim
names, memorizing Islamic prayer and playing a dice game that acted
out jihad, or holy war, they were subjected to indoctrination.
Although the state mandates seventh-graders students learn about
Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism and other religions, Byron
chose to simulate only Islam in the fall of 2001 for three weeks.
At the time, in a post-Sept. 11 environment, many Americans were
grappling with understanding more about this religion. In fact, this
lesson simulation was held up as creative teaching, and at the same
time critics blasted it as unpatriotic. It certainly went beyond
simple textbook regurgitation of facts, which is the noble goal of all
good teachers as they develop lesson plans. In fact, if the district
had exhibited such extensive lessons for other religions the state
wants our children to learn about, the indoctrination claim could
easily be dismissed as unfounded.
But it didn't, and this lawsuit is proceeding. It should be watched
very carefully by both school administrators and citizens. The
ultimate irony is that this situation may actually teach Byron
students more about civics than religion.