Lady
Justice was first violated in the muck and mire of San Francisco when
Mayor Newsom openly raped her, breaking the law and forcing gay
marriage upon her. The people cried out for Justice, but nobody cared.
Liberal judges stood on the sidelines, watching as Lady Justice lay
bruised and bloodied, violated over and over again, over 3,000 times.
Violation after violation to human dignity, morality, the law of
the land has been twisted and contorted as pedophiles and
pornographers are protected. Not one state voted in favor of gay
marriage, forty-two states have specifically passed legislation
defining marriage as between a man and a woman, yet four liberal
judges in Massachusetts demand the rape spread across the land as gay
marriage is forced upon a people unwilling.
On July 14th, President Bush, Senators Santorum, Cronyn,
Hatch and others proposed Congress put a stop to it with the Federal
Marriage Amendment to respect and protect the will of the people.
But the majority of our Senators are joining in, hangin’ with the
boys and enjoying the show. Senator Kennedy is applauding. Even the
girls are participating. Senator Hillary Clinton argued, "The Defense
of Marriage Act known as DOMA has not even been challenged at the
federal level." Senator Santorum proved this statement as flatly false
by submitting the pleadings in Florida and Washington State, both
challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act.
Many Senators carefully explained how lawsuits will continue to be
filed nationwide (in forty-six states already) until finally, after
the laws become so convoluted over it that, just like in Roe v. Wade,
the Supreme Court will come in and say, "Ah, we didn’t want to have to
do this..." and rule in favor of gay marriage, legalizing the rape of
the land against the will of the people.
Santorum quoted Senator Kennedy, "I happen to be someone that
supports the Court decision in Massachusetts. I’m proud of them."
Santorum said, "Proud that four justices redefined and forced the
legislature to rewrite their laws? What’s this agenda? [In essence,
saying] ‘I’m proud that four unelected judges can usurp the authority
of the legislative branch and roll them and force them to do something
that the people of Massachusetts don’t want, I’m PROUD of them.’
I don’t think John Adams would have said the same thing. I don’t
think Jefferson or Madison would have agreed. One of my colleagues
said he would agree with Madison. I don’t think Madison sees the role
of judges to rewrite the Constitution when they have a hankering to do
so. I think Mr. Madison would have a BIG TIME PROBLEM with what he
would see as an abuse of Article V. What’s Article V? The Amendment of
the Constitution Process. And no where in there do I see Mr. Madison
talking about judges changing the Constitution when they feel like it.
But you see, as Senator Clinton said, ‘I am in agreement that the
Constitution is a living and working accomplishment.’
My question is who’s doing the living? I thought from Article V
that the living part was those of us here in the legislative branch,
those of us across the States who would determine when it’s
appropriate to institute new rights or obligations in the
Constitution...That is NOT what those who oppose this Amendment
believe the Constitution is.
No, the living that’s going on is not the American public doing the
living. It’s a few hand-picked judges who claim the right."
One brave Senator noted that "in Lawrence v. Texas, the Supreme
Court ruled, ‘That the governing majority in the State has
traditionally viewed a particular practice as immoral is not
sufficient reason for upholding the law prohibiting the practice.’
Wow. Sorry about that State, sorry if you had morality as part of the
reason why you’re legislating but the Supreme Court doesn’t think
that’s enough."
Santorum quoted the Justices of Massachusetts who said, "marriage
is a stain on our laws that must be eradicated." Santorum said,
"That’s how Hollywood views marriage, that’s how the music industry
and the media views marriage. What are the media writing about? Are
they writing about this marriage debate? No, they’re writing about the
conflict between Republicans and trying to get a vote on the Senate."
Senators opposing the Amendment argue these are state’s rights.
Santorum pointed out that issue after issue, time after time,
Democrats vote to take rights away from the States:
"But when it comes to this fragile institution that is so out of
favor within the popular culture – listen to the music. Do you hear
affirming things about the treatment of women in the music in the
popular culture today? Do you hear songs about commitment and marriage
in the popular culture today? Do you see movies reaffirming the
traditional role of fathers raising children, the responsible actions
of parents? This is an institution that is swimming against a toxic
tide of popular culture that wants to just drown it."
Santorum said that the substance of argument from those who oppose
the Amendment claim the debate is 1. Political and 2. We should be
talking about homeland security.
Santorum said, "I’m for homeland security but there isn’t enough
money in the world that you can spend to secure THE HOME more than
marriage. If you want to invest in homeland security then you invest
in marriage, you invest in the stability of the family. That’s what
this amendment is. And the idea — I mean I hear this speaker — that
there are more important things to debate here in the Senate than ‘the
family’ — think about that. ‘There are more important things to
debate...’ which by the way won’t be spent until October 1st
of next year, ‘spending a few billion more dollars is more important
than preserving the traditional family.’ No, they haven’t been
debating the substance of it."
As Lady Justice lays bruised and bleeding in the muck of the
streets of our nation, watched by liberal Senators and judges
unwilling to help her, applauding and "proud" of the perpetrators,
many Americans weep. Americans that voted against gay marriage and
were usurped. The Americans that hoped for goodness and dignity for
their children, free to live and breathe without pervasive perversion
at every turn.
And the militant gay activists continue to dance in the streets,
drunk in the revelry, celebrating as they rip the fabric of our nation apart at the seams, desecrating
our schools and recruiting our children.
Liberal Senators are making a mockery of the Constitution they
swore to uphold. They did not stand up for Justice, for the law, for
the people, for the dignity of a nation. We will continue to be raped,
choking back our tears and weeping in muffled silence in the muck and
mire, witnessing the corruption of society, the death of our nation,
our hearts breaking for our children.
People, take care that the next Senator you vote for is not
standing by applauding.
See
How your Senator voted
See Also
Senators Defy Marriage Amendment:
America’s Taliban Tyranny
and Response to Gay
Community Anger
